Lowell Bernhardt and Nathaniel Agnew Boyd v. United States

230 F.2d 949
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 18, 1956
Docket12540_1
StatusPublished

This text of 230 F.2d 949 (Lowell Bernhardt and Nathaniel Agnew Boyd v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lowell Bernhardt and Nathaniel Agnew Boyd v. United States, 230 F.2d 949 (6th Cir. 1956).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal having been heard and considered on the oral arguments and briefs of both the appellants and the ap-pellee and on the record in the case, and it appearing that the points made by the appellants are both hypertechnical and unsound and even if conceded would fail to disclose that prejudicial error inheres in any ruling of the district court, its judgment in favor of the United States against appellants jointly for $11,514.00 and for an additional $2,000.00 against each of them pursuant to the pertinent statute is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
230 F.2d 949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lowell-bernhardt-and-nathaniel-agnew-boyd-v-united-states-ca6-1956.