Lowell Bernhardt and Nathaniel Agnew Boyd v. United States

Sixth Circuit

Lowell Bernhardt and Nathaniel Agnew Boyd v. United States

230 F.2d 949

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided February 18, 1956·No. 12540_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal having been heard and considered on the oral arguments and briefs of both the appellants and the ap-pellee and on the record in the case, and it appearing that the points made by the appellants are both hypertechnical and unsound and even if conceded would fail to disclose that prejudicial error inheres in any ruling of the district court, its judgment in favor of the United States against appellants jointly for $11,514.00 and for an additional $2,000.00 against each of them pursuant to the pertinent statute is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal having been heard and considered on the oral arguments and briefs of both the appellants and the ap-pellee and on the record in the case, and it appearing that the points made by the appellants are both hypertechnical and unsound and even if conceded would fail to disclose that prejudicial error inheres in any ruling of the district court, its judgment in favor of the United States against appellants jointly for $11,514.00 and for an additional $2,000.00 against each of them pursuant to the pertinent statute is affirmed.

Lowell Bernhardt and Nathaniel Agnew Boyd v. United States, 230 F.2d 949 (6th Cir. 1956).

Pincite

230 F.2d 949 (Lowell Bernhardt and Nathaniel Agnew Boyd v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.