Lowe v. Williams

94 U.S. 650, 24 L. Ed. 216, 1876 U.S. LEXIS 1923
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 16, 1877·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Me. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

The act of March 2, 1867, 14 Stat. 558, provided for the removal of causes from the State courts to the circuit courts, under certain circumstances, when due application was made “ before the final hearing or trial of the suit.” This we held in Stevenson v. Williams, 19 Wall. 575, to mean “ before final judgment in the court of original jurisdiction where the suit is brought.” To the same effect are Vannever v. Bryant, 21 id. 43, and Fashnacht v. Frank, 23 id. 419, decided since. The act of March 3, 1875, 18 Stat. 471, under which the removal was attempted in this case, requires the petition to be filed “ before the final trial.” The decisions under the act of 1867 are, therefore, equally applicable to that of 1875. The petition foi removal was filed in the appellate court, and, of course, long after the final judgment in the court of original jurisdiction.

Under these circumstances, we consider that, while a Federal question is presented by the record, it is one that has already been settled, and needs no further argument".

The motion to dismiss denied ; that to affirm granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lowe v. Williams, 94 U.S. 650, 24 L. Ed. 216, 1876 U.S. LEXIS 1923 (1877).

94 U.S. 650 (Lowe v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Filan v. Martin
684 P.2d 769 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1984)
Harr v. Wright
164 Misc. 395 (New York Supreme Court, 1936)
Katz v. Herschel Mfg. Co.
150 F. 684 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nebraska, 1906)
United States v. Curtis
11 Abb. N. Cas. 1 (S.D. New York, 1882)
In re Frazer
9 F. Cas. 729 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan, 1878)