Lowe v. Walbro LLC

District Court, E.D. Michigan·Decided August 8, 2022·No. 1:18-cv-12835·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

KENNETH LOWE,

Plaintiff, Case No. 1:18-cv-12835

v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington United States District Judge WALBRO LLC,

Defendant. ________________________________________/

OPINION AND ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE AND STAYING CASE SUA SPONTE

This is an employment-discrimination action arising under diversity jurisdiction. On May 13, 2022, this Court issued an amended scheduling order that set dates for Rule 23(a)(3)(b) disclosures, motions in limine, pretrial disclosures, a final pretrial conference, and a firm jury trial. ECF No. 47. Under the Eastern District of Michigan’s Local Rules, an attorney must be “a member in good standing of the bar of this court to practice in this court.” E.D. Mich. LR 83.20(i)(1). On July 11, 2022, The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan suspended Plaintiff’s attorney, Thomas Warnicke, under Local Rule 83.22. In re Warnicke, No. 2:22-mc- 51135 (E.D. Mich. July 11, 2022), ECF No. 2. This Court has the inherent authority to stay proceedings. See Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254–55 (1936) (holding that “the power to stay proceedings is incidental to the power inherent in every court to control the disposition of the causes in its docket with economy of time and effort for itself, for counsel[,] and for litigants.”). Exercising such authority is within the court’s discretion. Ohio Env’t Council v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 565 F.2d 393, 396 (6th Cir. 1977). As a result of Attorney Warnicke’s suspension, Plaintiff’s attorney may not practice in this Court. To avoid prejudice to the Plaintiff, who now finds himself without counsel, this Court will sua sponte stay this case for 30 days—until September 7, 2022. In addition, Plaintiff will be directed to show cause in writing within two weeks of this order (1) why this Court should not remove Attorney Thomas Warnicke from this case and (2) why this case should proceed with

Attorney Warnicke or new counsel. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff is DIRECTED to show cause in writing on or before August 22, 2022, why this Court should not remove Attorney Thomas Warnicke from this case. Further, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff is DIRECTED to show cause in writing on or before August 22, 2022, why this case should proceed with Attorney Warnicke or new counsel. Further, it is ORDERED that this case is stayed until September 7, 2022, or until further order of this Court.

Dated: August 8, 2022 s/Thomas L. Ludington THOMAS L. LUDINGTON United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lowe v. Walbro LLC, (E.D. Mich. 2022).

Lowe v. Walbro LLC (Lowe v. Walbro LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Landis v. North American Co.
299 U.S. 248 (Supreme Court, 1936)