Lowe v. State of Florida
This text of Lowe v. State of Florida (Lowe v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2023-1351 _____________________________
COREY LAMAR LOWE,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.
May 15, 2024
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236, 1241 (Fla. 2004) (explaining that habeas corpus may not “be used as a means to seek a second appeal or to litigate issues that could have been or were raised in a motion under rule 3.850”).
LEWIS, ROWE, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Corey Lamar Lowe, pro se, Petitioner.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lowe v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lowe-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2024.