Lowe v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 15, 2024·No. 2023-1351·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

No. 1D2023-1351

COREY LAMAR LOWE, Petitioner, v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.

May 15, 2024

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236, 1241 (Fla.

2004) (explaining that habeas corpus may not “be used as a means to seek a second appeal or to litigate issues that could have been or were raised in a motion under rule 3.850”).

LEWIS, ROWE, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Corey Lamar Lowe, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lowe v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2024).

Lowe v. State of Florida (Lowe v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baker v. State
29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 105 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)