Lowe v. Shah

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: July 1, 2005
• Docket: 05-6531
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6531

JAMES EDWARD LOWE, III,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DOCTOR SHAH, Medical Officer; DOCTOR GUZMAN, Medical Officer; DOCTOR ALLEN, Clinical Director; PA/MLP YIRGA, Physician Assistant; PA/MLP HILLETEWORK, Physician Assistant; PA/MLP OSORIO, Physician Assistant; DOCTOR BHULLER,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

JAMES M. BROOKS, Warden; HARLEY LAPPIN, Regional Director Mid-Atlantic Region; KATHLEEN HAWK-SAWYER, Director,

Defendants,

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Party in Interest.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-03-1423-1)

Submitted: June 23, 2005 Decided: July 1, 2005 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Edward Lowe, III, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c)

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

James Edward Lowe, III, appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on his Bivens* complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lowe v. Shah,

No. CA-03-1423-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 4, 2005). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

- 3 -