Lowe v. Lodge No. 1676, Benevolent & Protective Order of the Elks
437 So. 2d 213, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 23504
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 13, 1983
DocketNo. 83-589
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 437 So. 2d 213 (Lowe v. Lodge No. 1676, Benevolent & Protective Order of the Elks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lowe v. Lodge No. 1676, Benevolent & Protective Order of the Elks, 437 So. 2d 213, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 23504 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).
Opinion
We find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s refusal to exclude the testimony of the corporate defendant’s designee who was not listed by name in the court-ordered pre-trial catalog. See McDonald Air Conditioning, Inc. v. John Brown, Inc., 285 So.2d 697 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Metropolitan Dade County v. Coats
559 So. 2d 71 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
437 So. 2d 213, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 23504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lowe-v-lodge-no-1676-benevolent-protective-order-of-the-elks-fladistctapp-1983.