Lowe v. Lodge No. 1676, Benevolent & Protective Order of the Elks
437 So. 2d 213, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 23504
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 13, 1983·No. No. 83-589·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s refusal to exclude the testimony of the corporate defendant’s designee who was not listed by name in the court-ordered pre-trial catalog. See McDonald Air Conditioning, Inc. v. John Brown, Inc., 285 So.2d 697 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lowe v. Lodge No. 1676, Benevolent & Protective Order of the Elks, 437 So. 2d 213, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 23504 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).
437 So. 2d 213 (Lowe v. Lodge No. 1676, Benevolent & Protective Order of the Elks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Metropolitan Dade County v. Coats
559 So. 2d 71 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)