Lowe v. City Of Monrovia
This text of 784 F.2d 1407 (Lowe v. City Of Monrovia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
784 F.2d 1407
Kathryn LOWE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF MONROVIA, Paul Stuart, Robert Bartlett, Monrovia
City Council, John Nobrega, Mary Wilcox, Ed
Zoolalian, Robert Ovrom and Betty
Logans, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 84-5960.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
March 18, 1986.
Before PREGERSON and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The majority opinion filed in this case on October 30, 1985, as amended by the orders of December 26, 1985 and January 21, 1986, 775 F.2d 998, is further amended as follows:
Add the following sentence to the end of the paragraph on page 1009 which ends with "... articulated reason for its employment decision.":
The principles described above do not prevent the summary disposition of meritless suits but simply ensure that when a genuine issue of material fact exists a civil rights litigant will not be denied a trial on the merits.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
784 F.2d 1407, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 37437, 41 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 931, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lowe-v-city-of-monrovia-ca9-1986.