Lowe v. Burden

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Lowe v. Burden

97 S.E. 106, 22 Ga. App. 679, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 680

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 15, 1918

Docket9722

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 97 S.E. 106 (Lowe v. Burden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lowe v. Burden, 97 S.E. 106, 22 Ga. App. 679, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 680 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

1. The amendment to the motion for a new trial complains solely of the exclusion of certain evidence, but it is not shown therein that this evidence was offered by the plaintiff in error. Accordingly, that ground of the- motion raises no question for adjudication by this ' court.

2. There was some evidence which authorized the verdict; and, it having been approved by the trial judge, this court has no authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworih tend Harwell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI