Lowe v. Burden
97 S.E. 106, 22 Ga. App. 679, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 680
Opinion
1. The amendment to the motion for a new trial complains solely of the exclusion of certain evidence, but it is not shown therein that this evidence was offered by the plaintiff in error. Accordingly, that ground of the- motion raises no question for adjudication by this ' court.
2. There was some evidence which authorized the verdict; and, it having been approved by the trial judge, this court has no authority to interfere.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lowe v. Burden, 97 S.E. 106, 22 Ga. App. 679, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 680 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).
97 S.E. 106 (Lowe v. Burden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Trammell v. Shirley
145 S.E. 486 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Terry Shipbuilding Corp. v. Gregory
106 S.E. 803 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Kimbrel v. State
101 S.E. 920 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)