Lowe, Stein, Hoffman, Allweiss & Hauver, L.L.P. v. Ogunbor

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Lowe, Stein, Hoffman, Allweiss & Hauver, L.L.P. v. Ogunbor

889 So. 2d 1026, 2004 La. LEXIS 3693, 2004 WL 2914034

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided December 17, 2004·No. No. 2004-CC-1896·Published

Opinion

| (WEIMER, J.,

concurring.

The petition is captioned “Suit on Open Account.” The pleadings allege “[o]n or about the dates shown on the itemized statements attached hereto and made part hereof and marked for identification as exhibit ‘A,’ petitioner performed legal services on the account of defendant.” (Emphasis supplied.) Additionally, the petition alleges entitlement to attorney’s fees.¹

Considering the ambiguous pleadings and undeveloped record, I concur in the decision to refer the exception of prescription to the merits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

| (WEIMER, J.,

concurring.

The petition is captioned “Suit on Open Account.” The pleadings allege “[o]n or about the dates shown on the itemized statements attached hereto and made part hereof and marked for identification as exhibit ‘A,’ petitioner performed legal services on the account of defendant.” (Emphasis supplied.) Additionally, the petition alleges entitlement to attorney’s fees.¹

Considering the ambiguous pleadings and undeveloped record, I concur in the decision to refer the exception of prescription to the merits.

Lowe, Stein, Hoffman, Allweiss & Hauver, L.L.P. v. Ogunbor, 889 So. 2d 1026, 2004 La. LEXIS 3693, 2004 WL 2914034 (La. 2004).

Pincite

889 So. 2d 1026 (Lowe, Stein, Hoffman, Allweiss & Hauver, L.L.P. v. Ogunbor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.