Lowe, Alias Bradley, Alias Vance v. State

7 So. 2d 446, 150 Fla. 432, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1001
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 17, 1942·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appeal brings for review judgment of conviction of the offense of breaking and entering a room with intent to commit a misdemeanor, to-wit petit larceny, and of the offense of petit larceny.

Only two questions are presented. The first challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and the second challenges the correctness of the instructions given by the Court to the jury.

*433 The transcript has been examined and the evidence ■found sufficient. No. reversible error is found in the instructions given the jury and an examination of the entire record discloses no reversible error.

Judgment affirmed.

So ordered.

BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, BUFORD, and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lowe, Alias Bradley, Alias Vance v. State, 7 So. 2d 446, 150 Fla. 432, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1001 (Fla. 1942).

7 So. 2d 446 (Lowe, Alias Bradley, Alias Vance v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.