Lowder v. Lowder

415 S.E.2d 564, 106 N.C. App. 145, 1992 N.C. App. LEXIS 366
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided April 21, 1992·No. No. 9019SC1309·Published

Opinion

ARNOLD, Judge.

This is the twenty-sixth appeal in a series of cases emanating from Malcolm v. All Star Mills, Stanly Co. 79CVS015. In this latest guise, respondents once again have raised the jurisdiction issue which repeatedly has been rejected by this Court. We note nothing new in respondents’ arguments and find this appeal to be frivolous under N.C.R. App. P. 34(a)(1) and (a)(2). Pursuant to Rule 34(d) we direct that within not more than thirty days from the certification of this opinion respondents shall show cause in writing as to why this appeal should not be dismissed and why they should not be taxed for all reasonable expenses and costs incurred, including reasonable attorney fees and any other appropriate sanction. See N.C.R. App. P. 34(b)(1) and (b)(2); N.C.R. App. P. 35.

Remanded.

Judges LEWIS and Wynn concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lowder v. Lowder, 415 S.E.2d 564, 106 N.C. App. 145, 1992 N.C. App. LEXIS 366 (N.C. Ct. App. 1992).

415 S.E.2d 564 (Lowder v. Lowder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.