Lowden v. Moses

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Lowden v. Moses

14 S.C.L. 93

DecidedFebruary 15, 1825

StatusPublished

This text of 14 S.C.L. 93 (Lowden v. Moses) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lowden v. Moses, 14 S.C.L. 93 (S.C. Ct. App. 1825).

Pincite

Opinion

■ Johnson Justice,

tnquired if the schedule was filed within forty days from the passing of the act of 1823, and it \yas answered that the act passed the 20th of December and the schedule was filed on the 27th, only six days afterwards.

The counsel for the defendant were stopped by the court; and on a future day, the court, without delivering any [107]*107formal opinion, stated that they agreed in opinion with that expressed by the court below, and dismissed the motioit.

King and Gadsden for the motion.

Prioleau and Holmes, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

■ Johnson Justice,

tnquired if the schedule was filed within forty days from the passing of the act of 1823, and it \yas answered that the act passed the 20th of December and the schedule was filed on the 27th, only six days afterwards.

The counsel for the defendant were stopped by the court; and on a future day, the court, without delivering any [107]*107formal opinion, stated that they agreed in opinion with that expressed by the court below, and dismissed the motioit.

King and Gadsden for the motion.

Prioleau and Holmes, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 S.C.L. 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lowden-v-moses-scctapp-1825.