Low v. Steimel
204 S.W.3d 666, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1267, 2006 WL 2471658
Opinion
ORDER
Mr. Richard Low appeals the denial of his declaratory judgment action. The circuit court found that Mr. Low lacked standing because he did not possess a legally protected interest in the property at stake, and, therefore, was not entitled to judgment in his favor.
[667] For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Low v. Steimel, 204 S.W.3d 666, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1267, 2006 WL 2471658 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).
204 S.W.3d 666 (Low v. Steimel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.