Low v. Hauel

15 F. Cas. 1010, 1 Wall. Jr. 345, 1849 U.S. App. LEXIS 419

Opinion

ICANE, District Judge.

It is not usual, in this circuit, to insert a pecuniary penalty, though one is almost always found in the English forms. There was a ease here, some time since, where, a penalty being inserted, the matter was said to be misunderstood. The defendant, professing to understand it as an alternative, proceeded to violate the injunction, finding it more profitable. perhaps, to pay the penalty, than to desist from his work. Money penalty not inserted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Low v. Hauel, 15 F. Cas. 1010, 1 Wall. Jr. 345, 1849 U.S. App. LEXIS 419 (circtedpa 1849).

15 F. Cas. 1010 (Low v. Hauel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.