Low v. Hauel

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Low v. Hauel

15 F. Cas. 1010, 1 Wall. Jr. 345, 1849 U.S. App. LEXIS 419

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 29, 1849

StatusPublished

This text of 15 F. Cas. 1010 (Low v. Hauel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Low v. Hauel, 15 F. Cas. 1010, 1 Wall. Jr. 345, 1849 U.S. App. LEXIS 419 (circtedpa 1849).

Pincite

Opinion

ICANE, District Judge.

It is not usual, in this circuit, to insert a pecuniary penalty, though one is almost always found in the English forms. There was a ease here, some time since, where, a penalty being inserted, the matter was said to be misunderstood. The defendant, professing to understand it as an alternative, proceeded to violate the injunction, finding it more profitable. perhaps, to pay the penalty, than to desist from his work. Money penalty not inserted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ICANE, District Judge.

It is not usual, in this circuit, to insert a pecuniary penalty, though one is almost always found in the English forms. There was a ease here, some time since, where, a penalty being inserted, the matter was said to be misunderstood. The defendant, professing to understand it as an alternative, proceeded to violate the injunction, finding it more profitable. perhaps, to pay the penalty, than to desist from his work. Money penalty not inserted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 F. Cas. 1010, 1 Wall. Jr. 345, 1849 U.S. App. LEXIS 419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/low-v-hauel-circtedpa-1849.