Low v. Boston Five Cents Savings Bank

118 Mass. 260, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 351
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided September 4, 1875·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

The judge below has not found as a fact whether Wyeth had or had not made a valid assignment or transfer for sufficient consideration to Parker, but only that the plaintiff testified to what the defendant’s president told him upon that point. The ruling, without settling that fact, that as matter of law the plaintiff had failed to make out a case that entitled him to recover, was erroneous. Exceptions sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Low v. Boston Five Cents Savings Bank, 118 Mass. 260, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 351 (Mass. 1875).

118 Mass. 260 (Low v. Boston Five Cents Savings Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

John Hetherington & Sons, Ltd. v. William Firth Co.
95 N.E. 961 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1911)