Low v. Boston Five Cents Savings Bank
This text of 118 Mass. 260 (Low v. Boston Five Cents Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judge below has not found as a fact whether Wyeth had or had not made a valid assignment or transfer for sufficient consideration to Parker, but only that the plaintiff testified to what the defendant’s president told him upon that point. The ruling, without settling that fact, that as matter of law the plaintiff had failed to make out a case that entitled him to recover, was erroneous. Exceptions sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
118 Mass. 260, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/low-v-boston-five-cents-savings-bank-mass-1875.