Lovvorn v. Lovvorn

Supreme Court of Georgia

Lovvorn v. Lovvorn

185 S.E. 320, 182 Ga. 367, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 364

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedApril 17, 1936

DocketNo. 11179

StatusPublished

This text of 185 S.E. 320 (Lovvorn v. Lovvorn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lovvorn v. Lovvorn, 185 S.E. 320, 182 Ga. 367, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 364 (Ga. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Beck, Presiding Justice.

Boyd A. Lovvorn as executor of the estate filed a petition for construction of the will of E. M. Lovvorn, deceased. The will was executed on August 12, 1911, and the testator died in May, 1912. The will was probated a short time afterwards. J. E. Lovvorn was named as a legatee, he was never married, and died in March, 1932, without leaving any child. C. L. Lovvorn qualified as his executor. The item of the will for construction was as follows: “I give, bequeath, and devise to my surviving children, and to the lawful heirs of those not surviving, all my property, both real and personal, share and share alike, situate, lying, and being in Randolph County, Alabama. If either of said children shall die leaving no child or children, then the estate in remainder shall be equally divided, share and share alike, between the surviving children.” It is the contention of the plaintiff that at the death of J. E. Lovvorn the property which he took under the will reverted to the other heirs, the surviving children of the testator, while the executor of J. E. Lovvorn contends that he took absolute title, or a vested remainder. His general demurrer to the petition was sustained, and the plaintiff excepted.

We are of the opinion that the court erred in sustaining the demurrer. Under the item of the will quoted above, J. E. Lovvorn took title to his share of the estate, but this title was defeasible, being contingent upon his leaving a child or children; and when he died leaving no child or children, or descendant of such, and died without having ever married, the property which he took under his father’s will reverted to the estate of the testator, to be divided among the other children, share and share alike. The judgment sustaining the demurrer was contrary to this ruling, and must be reversed. Kemp v. Lewis, 147 Ga. 254 (93 S. E. 404).

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beck, Presiding Justice.

Boyd A. Lovvorn as executor of the estate filed a petition for construction of the will of E. M. Lovvorn, deceased. The will was executed on August 12, 1911, and the testator died in May, 1912. The will was probated a short time afterwards. J. E. Lovvorn was named as a legatee, he was never married, and died in March, 1932, without leaving any child. C. L. Lovvorn qualified as his executor. The item of the will for construction was as follows: “I give, bequeath, and devise to my surviving children, and to the lawful heirs of those not surviving, all my property, both real and personal, share and share alike, situate, lying, and being in Randolph County, Alabama. If either of said children shall die leaving no child or children, then the estate in remainder shall be equally divided, share and share alike, between the surviving children.” It is the contention of the plaintiff that at the death of J. E. Lovvorn the property which he took under the will reverted to the other heirs, the surviving children of the testator, while the executor of J. E. Lovvorn contends that he took absolute title, or a vested remainder. His general demurrer to the petition was sustained, and the plaintiff excepted.

We are of the opinion that the court erred in sustaining the demurrer. Under the item of the will quoted above, J. E. Lovvorn took title to his share of the estate, but this title was defeasible, being contingent upon his leaving a child or children; and when he died leaving no child or children, or descendant of such, and died without having ever married, the property which he took under his father’s will reverted to the estate of the testator, to be divided among the other children, share and share alike. The judgment sustaining the demurrer was contrary to this ruling, and must be reversed. Kemp v. Lewis, 147 Ga. 254 (93 S. E. 404).

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

185 S.E. 320, 182 Ga. 367, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lovvorn-v-lovvorn-ga-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack