Lovinsky v. Rosenberg

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Lovinsky v. Rosenberg

84 N.Y.S. 1134

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 22, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 84 N.Y.S. 1134 (Lovinsky v. Rosenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lovinsky v. Rosenberg, 84 N.Y.S. 1134 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

MacLEAN, J.

Upon a claim by an assignee for goods sold and delivered, and sale and delivery admitted, the defendant urged payment. That fact was disputed, and found against him, and no sufficient reason appears for interference here, excepting that, as the claim, dating from December 8, 1897, was for $106.25 and interest, and payment of $19 thereon was admitted by the assignor of the plaintiff, to whom, as testified, had been assigned the balance, the judgment rendered for $137.25 must be reduced to the sum of $115, besides costs, and, as thus modified, affirmed, without costs of this appeal. Judgment reduced to $115, besides costs, and, as thus modified, affirmed, without ■costs of this appeal. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacLEAN, J.

Upon a claim by an assignee for goods sold and delivered, and sale and delivery admitted, the defendant urged payment. That fact was disputed, and found against him, and no sufficient reason appears for interference here, excepting that, as the claim, dating from December 8, 1897, was for $106.25 and interest, and payment of $19 thereon was admitted by the assignor of the plaintiff, to whom, as testified, had been assigned the balance, the judgment rendered for $137.25 must be reduced to the sum of $115, besides costs, and, as thus modified, affirmed, without costs of this appeal. Judgment reduced to $115, besides costs, and, as thus modified, affirmed, without ■costs of this appeal. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 N.Y.S. 1134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lovinsky-v-rosenberg-nyappterm-1903.