Loving v. State

9 Tex. Ct. App. 471
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 1, 1880
StatusPublished

This text of 9 Tex. Ct. App. 471 (Loving v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Loving v. State, 9 Tex. Ct. App. 471 (Tex. Ct. App. 1880).

Opinion

White, P. J.

The bail-bond for Crabtree’s appearance was signed by the principal with his initials, thus : “ J. T. Crabtree.” The indictment afterwards returned by the grand jury was against one Riddle and John Crabtree jointly. Upon default of John Crabtree to appear and answer the indictment when the same was called for trial, judgment nisi was rendered upon the bail-bond, and scire facias issued to the sureties. There is no allegation in the scire facias that John Crabtree was the person who entered into the bail-bond under the name of “ J. T. Crabtree.” Such averment was necessary to the validity and sufficiency of the scire facias. Lowe v. The State, 15 Texas, 141; Cassaday v. The State, 4 Texas Ct. App. 96; Walter v. The State, 6 Texas Ct. App. 254.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Hurt, J., having been of counsel in the court below, does not sit in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lowe v. State
15 Tex. 141 (Texas Supreme Court, 1855)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 Tex. Ct. App. 471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loving-v-state-texapp-1880.