Loving & Co. v. Parker
85 S.E. 928, 16 Ga. App. 619, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 160
Opinion
1. There is no substantial merit in any of the exceptions to the charge of the court, when the excerpts complained of are viewed in connection with the entire charge.
2. The evidence sufficiently supported the allegations made in the petition, proof of which this court has heretofore held would warrant a recovery (Parker v. Loving, 13 Ga. App. 284, 79 S. E. 77), and the verdict was authorized.
3. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Loving & Co. v. Parker, 85 S.E. 928, 16 Ga. App. 619, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 160 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).
85 S.E. 928 (Loving & Co. v. Parker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Parker v. Loving & Co.
79 S.E. 77 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)