Lovett v. U.S. Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lovett v. U.S. Bank

183 So. 3d 415, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 16838, 2014 WL 5156162

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 15, 2014

DocketNo. 3D13-2362

StatusPublished

This text of 183 So. 3d 415 (Lovett v. U.S. Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lovett v. U.S. Bank, 183 So. 3d 415, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 16838, 2014 WL 5156162 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979) (“When there are issues of fact the appellant necessarily asks the reviewing court to draw conclusions about the evidence. Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as. to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”); FDIC v. Valente, 553 So.2d 763, 764 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989) (“Because a document that has been filed in the public records is still susceptible of reformation, a satisfaction recorded in the public record is not conclusive where the court is presented with the issue of the validity of the satisfaction.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979) (“When there are issues of fact the appellant necessarily asks the reviewing court to draw conclusions about the evidence. Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as. to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”); FDIC v. Valente, 553 So.2d 763, 764 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989) (“Because a document that has been filed in the public records is still susceptible of reformation, a satisfaction recorded in the public record is not conclusive where the court is presented with the issue of the validity of the satisfaction.”).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

183 So. 3d 415, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 16838, 2014 WL 5156162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lovett-v-us-bank-fladistctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack