Lovett v. United States

177 F.2d 282, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 3176
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 28, 1949
DocketNo. 12828
StatusPublished

This text of 177 F.2d 282 (Lovett v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lovett v. United States, 177 F.2d 282, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 3176 (5th Cir. 1949).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

■ Charged in four counts with violations of Sections 2810, 2833, and 2834, Title 26 [283]*283U.S.C.A. appellant was found guilty on the first count of the indictment charging possession and custody of an unregistered still, and not guilty on the remaining three counts. He is here insisting that circumstances relied on to convict him are not sufficient, within the rule laid down in Kassin v. United States, 5 Cir., 87 F.2d 183, Sutton v. United States, 5 Cir., 131 F.2d 108, and other similar cases.

Agreeing fully with appellant’s legal contention, we disagree that the circumstances are insufficient to satisfy the rule.

The district judge, of the opinion that the evidence, circumstantial though it was, made out a case for the jury, denied defendant’s motion for a directed verdict and sent the case to the jury in a charge, to which no exception was taken.

A careful examination of the record convinces us that the district judge did not err in denying the motion for an instructed verdict. The judgment is, therefore,

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kassin v. United States
87 F.2d 183 (Fifth Circuit, 1937)
Sutton v. United States
131 F.2d 108 (Fifth Circuit, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
177 F.2d 282, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 3176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lovett-v-united-states-ca5-1949.