Lovett v. United States

177 F.2d 282, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 3176
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 28, 1949·No. No. 12828·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

■ Charged in four counts with violations of Sections 2810, 2833, and 2834, Title 26 [283] U.S.C.A. appellant was found guilty on the first count of the indictment charging possession and custody of an unregistered still, and not guilty on the remaining three counts. He is here insisting that circumstances relied on to convict him are not sufficient, within the rule laid down in Kassin v. United States, 5 Cir., 87 F.2d 183, Sutton v. United States, 5 Cir., 131 F.2d 108, and other similar cases.

Agreeing fully with appellant’s legal contention, we disagree that the circumstances are insufficient to satisfy the rule.

The district judge, of the opinion that the evidence, circumstantial though it was, made out a case for the jury, denied defendant’s motion for a directed verdict and sent the case to the jury in a charge, to which no exception was taken.

A careful examination of the record convinces us that the district judge did not err in denying the motion for an instructed verdict. The judgment is, therefore,

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lovett v. United States, 177 F.2d 282, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 3176 (5th Cir. 1949).

177 F.2d 282 (Lovett v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kassin v. United States
87 F.2d 183 (Fifth Circuit, 1937)
Sutton v. United States
131 F.2d 108 (Fifth Circuit, 1942)