Lovett v. Pope
This text of 10 S.E.2d 754 (Lovett v. Pope) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
When this case was here on a former occasion it was held: “It was error to dismiss the action on the grounds that no cause was stated, and that the contract alleged as the cause of action was unilateral and without consideration.” Pope v. Lovett, 188 Ga. 524. On a subsequent trial before the jury the evidence, though conflicting, was sufficient to sustain the allegations of the petition. Consequently the judge did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial, which contained only the usual general grounds.
Judgment, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 S.E.2d 754, 190 Ga. 767, 1940 Ga. LEXIS 564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lovett-v-pope-ga-1940.