Lovett v. Pope

10 S.E.2d 754, 190 Ga. 767, 1940 Ga. LEXIS 564
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 25, 1940
Docket13382.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 10 S.E.2d 754 (Lovett v. Pope) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lovett v. Pope, 10 S.E.2d 754, 190 Ga. 767, 1940 Ga. LEXIS 564 (Ga. 1940).

Opinion

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

When this case was here on a former occasion it was held: “It was error to dismiss the action on the grounds that no cause was stated, and that the contract alleged as the cause of action was unilateral and without consideration.” Pope v. Lovett, 188 Ga. 524. On a subsequent trial before the jury the evidence, though conflicting, was sufficient to sustain the allegations of the petition. Consequently the judge did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial, which contained only the usual general grounds.

Judgment, affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garland v. Green
73 S.E.2d 187 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 S.E.2d 754, 190 Ga. 767, 1940 Ga. LEXIS 564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lovett-v-pope-ga-1940.