Lovett v. Pell

1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 399

Opinion

Error would not lie, since the Rev. Stat. by which it is provided that after verdict, a judgment shall not be reversed for mispleading, for a misjoinder of counts; but the mistake must be taken advantage of by demurrer. They also held, that the special assignment of errors in this case, “ that the issues joined were not tried, was bad, as it impeached the [400] record; and that the joinder in error was not a confession of the fact assigned as error, but operated as a demurrer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lovett v. Pell, 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 399 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).

1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 399 (Lovett v. Pell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.