Lovett v. Peake

333 F. App'x 729
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 14, 2009
DocketNo. 09-1116
StatusPublished

This text of 333 F. App'x 729 (Lovett v. Peake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lovett v. Peake, 333 F. App'x 729 (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jerry L. Lovett appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in this action alleging race and age discrimination in employment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lovett v. Peaks, No. 3:08-cv-00384-REP, 2009 WL 145003 (E.D.Va. Jan. 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade[730]*730quately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
333 F. App'x 729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lovett-v-peake-ca4-2009.