Lovett v. Parker

110 S.E. 723, 152 Ga. 576, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 221
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 14, 1922
DocketNo. 2392
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 110 S.E. 723 (Lovett v. Parker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lovett v. Parker, 110 S.E. 723, 152 Ga. 576, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 221 (Ga. 1922).

Opinion

Eisn, C. J.

Under tlie allegations of the petition tlie action could not be maintained without an administrator of the estate involved being made a party defendant. See McNair v. Brown, 139 Ga. 71 (76 S. E. 575). .Judgment affirmed.

All the Justiees concur. Defendants demurred to the petition, on the ground that the suit could not proceed without an administrator of the estate of John B. Parker being a party, and that the action could be maintained only against such an administrator, and not against the heirs. The demurrer was sustained on the ground that an administrator of the estate was a necessary party. In the judgment sustaining the demurrer the judge stated that the prayer for the appointment of an administrator was not insisted upon. Petitioner excepted. James A. Dixon and Overstreet & Overstreet, for plaintiff. (?. O. Delete and Phillips & Abbot, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coleman v. Thomasson
127 S.E. 129 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 S.E. 723, 152 Ga. 576, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lovett-v-parker-ga-1922.