Lovering v. Heard

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Lovering v. Heard

15 F. Cas. 1003, 1 Cranch 349

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedOctober 15, 1806

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 15 F. Cas. 1003 (Lovering v. Heard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lovering v. Heard, 15 F. Cas. 1003, 1 Cranch 349 (circtddc 1806).

Pincite

Opinion

LoveriDg lives in Alexandria. Motion for a rule on the plaintiff to give security for costs. Granted, after consideration of the laws of Maryland on that subject. Alexandria county is to this county as a separate state, governed by different laws, although under one jurisdiction. Execution will not run from one county into the other. The marshal cannot distrain in Alexandria, for fees due to the officers in Washington county. The modes of collecting fees are different. Rule granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LoveriDg lives in Alexandria. Motion for a rule on the plaintiff to give security for costs. Granted, after consideration of the laws of Maryland on that subject. Alexandria county is to this county as a separate state, governed by different laws, although under one jurisdiction. Execution will not run from one county into the other. The marshal cannot distrain in Alexandria, for fees due to the officers in Washington county. The modes of collecting fees are different. Rule granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 F. Cas. 1003, 1 Cranch 349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lovering-v-heard-circtddc-1806.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack