Loverin v. School-District No. 3, Croydon

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Loverin v. School-District No. 3, Croydon

6 A. 35, 64 N.H. 102

DecidedJune 5, 1886

StatusPublished

This text of 6 A. 35 (Loverin v. School-District No. 3, Croydon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Loverin v. School-District No. 3, Croydon, 6 A. 35, 64 N.H. 102 (N.H. 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

Doe, C. J.

Since the trial, district No. 3 has been abolished by c. 43, Laws 1885. The town district, being now the defendant in interest on the question of school-house location, should be made a defendant of record, and should have notice and an opportunity to be heard. The plaintiffs may move at the trial term for an amendment and notice; and the case is continued.

Clark, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doe, C. J.

Since the trial, district No. 3 has been abolished by c. 43, Laws 1885. The town district, being now the defendant in interest on the question of school-house location, should be made a defendant of record, and should have notice and an opportunity to be heard. The plaintiffs may move at the trial term for an amendment and notice; and the case is continued.

Clark, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 A. 35, 64 N.H. 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loverin-v-school-district-no-3-croydon-nh-1886.