Lovell v. State

838 So. 2d 613, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1699, 2003 WL 341050
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 17, 2003
DocketNo. 1D02-2881
StatusPublished

This text of 838 So. 2d 613 (Lovell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lovell v. State, 838 So. 2d 613, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1699, 2003 WL 341050 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This direct criminal appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Having reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred. We affirm the appellant’s revocation of probation and imposition of judgment and sentence. However, because the record does not contain a written order of revocation of community control listing the conditions of community control violated, we remand for the trial court to enter such an order, consistent with its oral pronouncement. See Oliver v. State, 819 So.2d 816 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

AFFIRMED.

WEBSTER, PADOVANO and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Oliver v. State
819 So. 2d 816 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
838 So. 2d 613, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1699, 2003 WL 341050, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lovell-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.