Lovell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lovell v. State

838 So. 2d 613, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1699, 2003 WL 341050

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 17, 2003·No. No. 1D02-2881·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This direct criminal appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Having reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred. We affirm the appellant’s revocation of probation and imposition of judgment and sentence. However, because the record does not contain a written order of revocation of community control listing the conditions of community control violated, we remand for the trial court to enter such an order, consistent with its oral pronouncement. See Oliver v. State, 819 So.2d 816 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

AFFIRMED.

WEBSTER, PADOVANO and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This direct criminal appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Having reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred. We affirm the appellant’s revocation of probation and imposition of judgment and sentence. However, because the record does not contain a written order of revocation of community control listing the conditions of community control violated, we remand for the trial court to enter such an order, consistent with its oral pronouncement. See Oliver v. State, 819 So.2d 816 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

AFFIRMED.

WEBSTER, PADOVANO and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Lovell v. State, 838 So. 2d 613, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1699, 2003 WL 341050 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

838 So. 2d 613 (Lovell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related