Lovell v. Roebuck

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Lovell v. Roebuck

35 Misc. 831, 72 N.Y.S. 1116

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1901

StatusPublished

This text of 35 Misc. 831 (Lovell v. Roebuck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lovell v. Roebuck, 35 Misc. 831, 72 N.Y.S. 1116 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiffs’ cause of action was abundantly sustained by the evidence. The defendant repeatedly admitted the correctness of the account except as to a few small items [832]*832which appear to ‘have been allowed to him. The counterclaim seems to have been an afterthought, as it was wholly disallowed; it is of no consequence whether the justice was right or wrong in i of using the motion to allow defendant to increase the amount for which he counterclaimed. -

Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The plaintiffs’ cause of action was abundantly sustained by the evidence. The defendant repeatedly admitted the correctness of the account except as to a few small items [832]*832which appear to ‘have been allowed to him. The counterclaim seems to have been an afterthought, as it was wholly disallowed; it is of no consequence whether the justice was right or wrong in i of using the motion to allow defendant to increase the amount for which he counterclaimed. -

Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 Misc. 831, 72 N.Y.S. 1116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lovell-v-roebuck-nyappterm-1901.