Lovell v. Planters Bank & Trust Co.
516 U.S. 1142, 116 S. Ct. 977, 133 L. Ed. 2d 896
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 20, 1996·No. No. 95-634; No. 95-784; No. 95-5600; No. 95-5801; No. 95-5852; No. 95-6097; No. 95-6268; No. 95-6369; No. 95-6373; No. 95-6450; No. 95-6455; No. 95-6460; No. 95-6592; No. 95-6603; No. 95-6697; No. 95-6789; No. 95-6824; No. 95-6903; No. 95-6940·Published·Cited by 16 cases
Opinion
ante, p. 1029;
ante, p. 1048;
ante, p. 992;
ante, p. 1050;
ante, p. 1050;
ante, p. 1050;
ante, p. 1013;
ante, p. 1051;
ante, 1051; P'
ante, p. 1052;
ante, p. 1052;
ante, p. 1068;'
ante, p. 1055;
ante, p. 1056;
ante, p. 1058;
ante, p. 1061;
ante, p. 1062;
ante, p. 1068; and
ante, p. 1065. Petitions for rehearing denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lovell v. Planters Bank & Trust Co., 516 U.S. 1142, 116 S. Ct. 977, 133 L. Ed. 2d 896 (1996).
516 U.S. 1142 (Lovell v. Planters Bank & Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Ford
976 So. 2d 321 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2008)
State v. Tyner
953 So. 2d 865 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2007)
State v. Qualls
921 So. 2d 226 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2006)
State v. Sanders
900 So. 2d 221 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2005)
State v. Richardson
896 So. 2d 257 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2005)
Reed v. Cockrell
269 F. Supp. 2d 784 (N.D. Texas, 2003)
Williamson v. Allstate Insurance
204 F.R.D. 641 (D. Arizona, 2001)
McClain v. Hill
52 F. Supp. 2d 1133 (C.D. California, 1999)
United States v. Alberto Negron
116 F.3d 487 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
State v. Flanagan
691 So. 2d 866 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1997)
State v. Rhodes
688 So. 2d 628 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1997)
State v. Allen
682 So. 2d 713 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1996)
Ronald R. Crenshaw v. K.W. Prunty, Warden Attorney General of the State of California
89 F.3d 844 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2296, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 3852 Ramon Martinez-Villareal, Petitioner-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Samuel Lewis, Respondent-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
80 F.3d 1301 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
Martinez-Villareal v. Lewis
80 F.3d 1301 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)