Loveless v. McCollum

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Loveless v. McCollum

5 S.E.2d 921, 61 Ga. App. 167, 1939 Ga. App. LEXIS 247

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 29, 1939·No. 27209.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Stephens, P. J.

In conformity to the answer of the Supreme Court to certified, questions in this ease (189 Ga. 219, 5 S. E. 2d, 582), the writ of error is dismissed. Direction is given that the official copy of the bill *168 of exceptions of file in the office of the clerk of the trial court shall operate as exceptions pendente lite.

Decided November 29, 1939. II. A. Etheridge, for plaintiff. A. C. Corbett, Howard, Tiller & Howard, for defendant.

Writ of error dismissed, with ¿Direction.

Sutton and Felton, JJ., eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephens, P. J.

In conformity to the answer of the Supreme Court to certified, questions in this ease (189 Ga. 219, 5 S. E. 2d, 582), the writ of error is dismissed. Direction is given that the official copy of the bill *168 of exceptions of file in the office of the clerk of the trial court shall operate as exceptions pendente lite.

Decided November 29, 1939. II. A. Etheridge, for plaintiff. A. C. Corbett, Howard, Tiller & Howard, for defendant.

Writ of error dismissed, with ¿Direction.

Sutton and Felton, JJ., eoneur.

Loveless v. McCollum, 5 S.E.2d 921, 61 Ga. App. 167, 1939 Ga. App. LEXIS 247 (Ga. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

5 S.E.2d 921 (Loveless v. McCollum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related