Loveless v. Mapco Express
644 So. 2d 182, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10472, 1994 WL 588177
Opinion
The judge of compensation claims has the exclusive authority to evaluate the credibility of witnesses, weigh the evidence and resolve [183] conflicts in the testimony. We find competent substantial evidence to support the judge’s order. Her determinations concerning the credibility of witnesses are within her authority and do not appear to be clearly arbitrary and unreasonable. See, Batka v. Duff's Smorgasbord, 560 So.2d 377, 379 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), and Bray v. Electronic Door-Lift, Inc., 558 So.2d 43, 46 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Loveless v. Mapco Express, 644 So. 2d 182, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10472, 1994 WL 588177 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
644 So. 2d 182 (Loveless v. Mapco Express) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bray v. Electronic Door-Lift, Inc.
558 So. 2d 43 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Batka v. Duff's Smorgasbord
560 So. 2d 377 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)