Loveland v. Tidman
This text of 85 N.Y.S. 1136 (Loveland v. Tidman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event, upon questions of law and of fact. Held that, under the circumstances of this case, the conduct of the jury awarding damages against the receiver of the railroad company for the assault complained of, at the same time that it found a verdict in favor of the defendant Mullen, who was concededly the chief offender in any assault committed, was so inconsistent as to indicate the controlling presence of prejudice, passion, or misunderstanding, and that the interests of justice require a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
85 N.Y.S. 1136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loveland-v-tidman-nyappdiv-1903.