Lovelace v. Verizon Wireless Services LLC
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION JOHN H. LOVELACE, JR. PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 4:20-cv-01348-KGB VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES, LLC and CELLCO PARTNERSHIP DEFENDANT ORDER Before the Court is the parties’ joint stipulation of dismissal (Dkt. No. 47). The parties stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of plaintiff John Lovelace’s complaint against defendants Cellco Partnership and Verizon Wireless Services, LLC, with all parties to bear their own costs. Provided the stipulation accords with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A) Gi), it operates to dismiss Mr. Lovelace’s complaint by agreement “executed by the parties without any involvement by the court.” White v. Nat’l Football League, 756 F.3d 585, 595 (8th Cir. 2014). The Court finds that the stipulation accords with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)Gi), adopts the stipulation, and dismisses with prejudice Mr. Lovelace’s complaint. It is so ordered this 7th day of August, 2023. shu A. Palin Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lovelace v. Verizon Wireless Services LLC (Lovelace v. Verizon Wireless Services LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.