Lovelace v. SSA

District Court, E.D. Texas·Decided July 7, 2020·No. 2:19-cv-00012·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

WANDA R. LOVELACE, § § Petitioner, § § v. § Case No. 2:19-cv-012-RSP § COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY § ADMINISTRATION, § § Defendant. §

MEMORANDUM ORDER Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion and Incorporated Brief for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (Dkt. No. 22), filed by Petitioner on May 18, 2020. The motion seeks compensation for 1.5 hours in 2018, 26.2 hours in 2019, and 2.5 hours in 2020 at the adjusted statutory rates permitted by the Act, for a total of $6,025.00, inclusive of costs. The Commissioner does not oppose the requested award of fees and costs. (Dkt. No. 23). The Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. §2412, allows a prevailing party in litigation against the United States, including a petitioner for Social Security benefits, to recover his attorney’s fees “unless the court finds that the position of the United States was substantially justified or that special circumstances make an award unjust.” Id. at §2412 (d)(1)(a). The Supreme Court has explained that “EAJA fees are determined not by a percent of the amount recovered, but by the ‘time expended’ and the attorney’s ‘hourly rate,’” which is statutorily capped. Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 794, 122 S.Ct. 1817, 152 L.Ed.2d 996 (2002). See generally, Murkeldove v. Astrue, 635 F.3d 784, 789 (5th Cir. 2011). The Commissioner does not contend, nor does the Court find, that the position of the government was substantially justified or that any special circumstances exist rendering an award unjust. The Court finds that Petitioner’s requested fee is appropriate. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant will pay Petitioner $6,025.00 in EAJA fees, which includes any costs. In accordance with the Supreme Court’s decision in Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010), this award will be payable to Petitioner, by delivery to her counsel of record. SIGNED this 6th day of July, 2020.

ox 9. ROY S. PAYNE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

_2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lovelace v. SSA, (E.D. Tex. 2020).

Lovelace v. SSA (Lovelace v. SSA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gisbrecht v. Barnhart
535 U.S. 789 (Supreme Court, 2002)
Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)
Murkeldove v. Astrue
635 F.3d 784 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)