Lovelace v. Graham

Indiana Court of Appeals

Lovelace v. Graham

210 N.E.2d 384, 137 Ind. App. 558, 1965 Ind. App. LEXIS 620

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 29, 1965

DocketNo. 20,235

StatusPublished

This text of 210 N.E.2d 384 (Lovelace v. Graham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lovelace v. Graham, 210 N.E.2d 384, 137 Ind. App. 558, 1965 Ind. App. LEXIS 620 (Ind. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Bierly, C. J.

Appellant, by Richard P. Watson, his attorney, and appellees, by H. Harold Soshnick, their attorney, on September 8, 1965, jointly filed a motion in this cause requesting a dismissal of this appeal.

. Said joint motion and dismissal was based on the reason that the matters in controversy between the parties hereto have been compromised and settled.

Said joint motion is now submitted to the court for determination; and the court, having examined said motion, finds that the same should be granted.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND DECREED by the court that said appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed with costs taxed against appellant.

Appeal dismissed, with costs taxed against appellant.

Note. — Reported in 210 N. E. 2d 884.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI