Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/Lovelace v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POSTPRISON SUPERVISION

Lovelace v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POSTPRISON SUPERVISION

51 P.3d 1274
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided August 14, 2002·No. A109610·Published

Opinion

51 P.3d 1274 (2002)
183 Or.App. 376

Scott A. LOVELACE, Petitioner,
v.
BOARD OF PAROLE AND POSTPRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent.

A109610.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Motion to Dismiss August 17, 2001.
Motion to Dismiss September 20, 2001.
Amended Motion to Dismiss December 19, 2001.
Amended Motion to Dismiss January 17, 2002.
Decided August 14, 2002.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General, and Judy C. Lucas, Assistant Attorney General, for the motion.

Scott A. Lovelace, pro se, contra.

Before BREWER, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM and KISTLER, Judges.

On Respondent's Motion to Dismiss August 17, 2001.

Petitioner's Answer and Opposition to Respondent's Motion to Dismiss September 20, 2001.

Respondent's Amended Motion to Dismiss December 19, 2001.

Petitioner's Answer and Opposition to Respondent's Amended Motion to Dismiss January 17, 2002.

*1275 PER CURIAM.

Motion to dismiss denied. Lovelace v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, 183 Or.App. 283, 51 P.3d 1269 (2002).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lovelace v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POSTPRISON SUPERVISION, 51 P.3d 1274 (Or. Ct. App. 2002).

51 P.3d 1274 (Lovelace v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POSTPRISON SUPERVISION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lovelace v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
51 P.3d 1269 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2002)
Lovelace v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
51 P.3d 1274 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2002)