Lovelace Lumber Co. v. Bohler

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Lovelace Lumber Co. v. Bohler

120 S.E. 640, 31 Ga. App. 296, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 899

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedDecember 5, 1923

Docket14941, 14942

StatusPublished

This text of 120 S.E. 640 (Lovelace Lumber Co. v. Bohler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lovelace Lumber Co. v. Bohler, 120 S.E. 640, 31 Ga. App. 296, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 899 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. Under the facts of the case the overruling of the motion for a nonsuit was not error.

2. The jury returned a verdict'for the plaintiff for $500, and the plaintiff made a motion for a new trial which was based upon the usual general grounds only. As there was some evidence to support the verdict, this court is without authority to interfere with the judgment overruling the motion.

Judgment affirmed on main and cross-hills of exceptions.

Luke- and Blood-worth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

1. Under the facts of the case the overruling of the motion for a nonsuit was not error.

2. The jury returned a verdict'for the plaintiff for $500, and the plaintiff made a motion for a new trial which was based upon the usual general grounds only. As there was some evidence to support the verdict, this court is without authority to interfere with the judgment overruling the motion.

Judgment affirmed on main and cross-hills of exceptions.

Luke- and Blood-worth, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 S.E. 640, 31 Ga. App. 296, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lovelace-lumber-co-v-bohler-gactapp-1923.