Lovejoy v. Wilson

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Lovejoy v. Wilson

15 F. Cas. 1000, 1 Cranch 102

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedDecember 15, 1802

StatusPublished

This text of 15 F. Cas. 1000 (Lovejoy v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lovejoy v. Wilson, 15 F. Cas. 1000, 1 Cranch 102 (circtddc 1802).

Pincite

Opinion

KILTY, Chief Judge,

was of opinion that the evidence was applicable to that count. No account being filed, the words “as by a particular account,” &c., must be rejected as surplusage, and then the count will stand as a general indebitatus assumpsit “for sundry matters chargeable in account;” and money lent is a matter chargeable in account.

MARSHALL, Circuit Judge, and CRANCH, Circuit Judge, did not object

(Quaere as to this point.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KILTY, Chief Judge,

was of opinion that the evidence was applicable to that count. No account being filed, the words “as by a particular account,” &c., must be rejected as surplusage, and then the count will stand as a general indebitatus assumpsit “for sundry matters chargeable in account;” and money lent is a matter chargeable in account.

MARSHALL, Circuit Judge, and CRANCH, Circuit Judge, did not object

(Quaere as to this point.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 F. Cas. 1000, 1 Cranch 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lovejoy-v-wilson-circtddc-1802.