Lovejoy v. Cathcart

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: August 4, 2005
• Docket: 05-6416
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6416

MARVIN LOVEJOY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RICHARD CATHCART, State Attorney; HENRY D. MCMASTER, Attorney General for the State of South Carolina; DAVID M. TATARSKY, General Counsel for the South Carolina Department of Corrections; JON OZMINT, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (CA-04-22155-8-24BI)

Submitted: July 27, 2005 Decided: August 4, 2005

Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marvin Lovejoy, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Marvin Lovejoy appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lovejoy v.

Cathcart, No. CA-04-22155-8-24BI (D.S.C. Feb. 17, 2005). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -