Lovejoy v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Florida

Lovejoy v. Anderson

366 So. 2d 396, 1978 Fla. LEXIS 5059

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 7, 1978·No. No. 53472·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner has asked us to review the decision of the First District Court of Appeal, reported at 354 So.2d. 951, alleging that it is in direct conflict with the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal in Randle Eastern Ambulance Service, Inc. v. Vasta, 345 So.2d 1084 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). We recently quashed this latter decision. Randle-Eastern Ambulance Service, Inc. v. Vasta, 360 So.2d 68 (Fla.1978). The conflict of decisions having been dispelled, certiorari is denied.

It is so ordered.

ENGLAND, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner has asked us to review the decision of the First District Court of Appeal, reported at 354 So.2d. 951, alleging that it is in direct conflict with the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal in Randle Eastern Ambulance Service, Inc. v. Vasta, 345 So.2d 1084 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). We recently quashed this latter decision. Randle-Eastern Ambulance Service, Inc. v. Vasta, 360 So.2d 68 (Fla.1978). The conflict of decisions having been dispelled, certiorari is denied.

It is so ordered.

ENGLAND, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.

Lovejoy v. Anderson, 366 So. 2d 396, 1978 Fla. LEXIS 5059 (Fla. 1978).

Pincite

366 So. 2d 396 (Lovejoy v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related