Love v. Worcester Consolidated Street Railway Co.
This text of 99 N.E. 960 (Love v. Worcester Consolidated Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
At the time of the accident the automobile was not registered in the name of its owner. It was therefore unlawfully upon the highway, and the defendant owed to the plaintiff no other duty than that of abstaining from injuring hita by wantonness or recklessness. The case is fully covered by Dudley v. Northampton Street Railway, 202 Mass. 443, and Chase v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 208 Mass. 137.
Judgment for the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
99 N.E. 960, 213 Mass. 137, 1912 Mass. LEXIS 685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/love-v-worcester-consolidated-street-railway-co-mass-1912.