Love v. Weeks

1954 OK 81, 268 P.2d 215, 1954 Okla. LEXIS 458
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedMarch 16, 1954
DocketNo. 36211
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1954 OK 81 (Love v. Weeks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Love v. Weeks, 1954 OK 81, 268 P.2d 215, 1954 Okla. LEXIS 458 (Okla. 1954).

Opinion

O’NEAL, Justice.

Plaintiff obtained a judgment in the trial court in damages against defendant and on October 1, 1953, defendant filed his petition in error with case-made attached in this court. The order overruling the motion for new trial was entered June 5, 1953. No order was made by the trial court extending the time in which .an appeal could be filed.

A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason the appeal was not filed within three months after the . order overruling the motion for new trial or any order extending the time for appeal. The motion to dismiss must be sustained. In Roof v. Fechtel, Okl. Sup., 258 P.2d 890, we said:

“Where the petition in error with record or case made is not filed within three months after the judgment or final order made in the case and there has been no order of the trial court extending the time for appeal as provided by 12, O.S.1951 § 972, the appeal will be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.”
Appeal dismissed.
HALLEY, C. J., JOHNSON, V. C. J., and WELCH, CORN,' DAVISON, WILLIAMS and'BLACKBIRD, JJ., ■ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Auto Convoy Company v. Smith
1960 OK 73 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1954 OK 81, 268 P.2d 215, 1954 Okla. LEXIS 458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/love-v-weeks-okla-1954.