Home/Tenth Circuit/Love v. The Basque Cartel

Love v. The Basque Cartel

95 F.3d 1161
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedAugust 26, 1996
Docket95-8018
StatusUnpublished

This text of 95 F.3d 1161 (Love v. The Basque Cartel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Love v. The Basque Cartel, 95 F.3d 1161 (10th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

95 F.3d 1161

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

DRY CREEK CATTLE COMPANY, a wyoming Partnership, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
THE BASQUE CARTEL; Steve Adami; Tom Borgialli; Simon
Iberlin; Martin S. Harriet; John Iberlin; Lowham
Associates, a Wyoming Corporation; Paul Lowham; Farmers
National Company; Garry Davis; and Mary K. Davis.
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-8018. (D.C. No. 94-0109)

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Aug. 26, 1996.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

BEFORE:KELLY, Circuit Judge, BARRETT, AND JONES**, Senior Circuit Judges.

On appeal, the Plaintiffs contend that the district court erred when it entered summary judgment in favor of the Defendants. We review the district court's decision to grant summary judgment de novo. Lanphere & Urbaniak v. Colorado, 21 F.3d 1508, 1511 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ---, 115 S.Ct. 638 (1994). After a thorough examination of the parties' briefs, the auction videotape, and the record, we find that the district court correctly entered summary judgment for the Defendants.

Furthermore, it would be duplicative and serve no useful purpose to reiterate the excellent legal analysis developed by the court below in its published opinion. Love v. Basque Cartel, 873 F.Supp. 563 (D.Wyo.1995). Accordingly, we adopt the opinion of the district court and, therefore, affirm.

Entered for the Court:

Nathaniel R. Jones

Senior Circuit Judge

*

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3

**

The Honorable Nathaniel R. Jones, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Joseph R. Brunetti and Florence Brunetti v. The Regency Affiliates, a Nevada Nonprofit Organization Regency Group, Inc., a Nevada Corporation Sun Tree Corporation, D/B/A Clearbrook Apartment Village 9th & 9th Market & Cafe, a Utah Corporation R.G. Utah, Inc., a Utah Corporation 2nd Avenue Market & Cafe, a Utah Corporation Whole Earth Enterprises, a Utah Corporation, D/B/A the John Henry-Mackay Company New Frontiers Natural Foods I, a Nevada Corporation New Frontiers Natural Foods Ii, a Nevada Corporation New Frontiers Natural Foods Iii, a Nevada Corporation A.J. MacKay & Sons, a Utah Corporation Northern Nevada Construction, Inc., a Nevada Corporation Three J Enterprises, a Utah Corporation Asbestos Transport Systems, a Nevada Corporation Lumberland, Inc., a Utah Corporation Porter-Knollwood Estates, a Utah Corporation Natural Abilities, Inc., a Utah Corporation Genesis I Builders, a California Nonprofit Organization Builders Construction Company, Inc., a Nevada Corporation Norman Paulsen John H. McCaughey Jonathan King Joseph Belton and David Eddy, Defendants-Third-Party v. Jones, Waldo, Holbrook & McDonough a Utah Professional Corporation, Third-Party Flying S Land & Cattle Co., a Nevada Corporation Regency Group, Inc., a Nevada Corporation the Regency Affiliates, a Nevada Nonprofit Organization Builders Land & Construction Company a Nevada Corporation Oasis Energy Corporation, a Nevada Corporation International Reserve Investments & Construction Company, a Hawaii Corporation and Genesis I Builders, a California Nonprofit Organization v. Jones, Waldo, Holbrook & McDonough a Utah Professional Corporation v. Jones, Waldo, Holbrook & McDonough a Utah Professional Corporation, Counterclaimant-Appellee v. Flying S Land & Cattle Co., a Nevada Corporation Regency Group, Inc., a Nevada Corporation the Regency Affiliates, a Nevada Nonprofit Organization Builders Land & Construction Company a Nevada Corporation Oasis Energy Corporation, a Nevada Corporation and Genesis I Builders, a California Nonprofit Organization, Counterclaim-Defendants-Appellants, and Northern Holdings Utah, Inc., a Nevada Corporation Builders Construction Company, Inc., a Nevada Corporation Porter-Knollwood Estates, a Utah Corporation Sun Tree Corporation, D/B/A Clearbrook Apartment Village New Frontiers Natural Foods I, a Nevada Corporation New Frontiers Natural Foods Ii, a Nevada Corporation New Frontiers Natural Foods Iii, a Nevada Corporation New Frontiers Natural Foods Iv, a Nevada Corporation New Frontiers Natural Foods V, a Nevada Corporation Northern Nevada Construction, Inc., a Nevada Corporation Waste Control Management Nevada, Inc., a Nevada Corporation Patricia Decataldo Norman Paulsen Joseph Belton and Jonathan King, Counterclaim-Defendants
95 F.3d 1161 (Third Circuit, 1996)
Love v. Basque Cartel
873 F. Supp. 563 (D. Wyoming, 1995)
Lanphere & Urbaniak v. Colorado
21 F.3d 1508 (Tenth Circuit, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 F.3d 1161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/love-v-the-basque-cartel-ca10-1996.