Love v. State

9 S.W.2d 1033, 110 Tex. Crim. 573, 1928 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 691
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 20, 1928
DocketNo. 11844.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 9 S.W.2d 1033 (Love v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Love v. State, 9 S.W.2d 1033, 110 Tex. Crim. 573, 1928 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 691 (Tex. 1928).

Opinions

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for aggravated assault ; punishment, one year in the county jail.

Appellant was indicted for an assault with intent to murder, and upon trial was found guilty as above stated-.

The record is before us without any bills of exception. It contains what is called “Assignments of error, one to nine,” which appear to have been filed with the clerk without any signature thereto or approval by the court. The practice before this court does not call for such procedure as this. There being no bills of exception, the only question before us is the sufficiency of the testimony. There was a shooting by each party to the difficulty on the occasion in question, appellant using a shot gun and the injured party a target rifle. There was some controversy as to who fired the first shot. Appellant was under the influence of intoxicating liquor and came down to the premises of the injured party, indulging in abusive language and threats. We think the jury justified in their conclusion of guilt.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Orr
11 S.W.2d 761 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 S.W.2d 1033, 110 Tex. Crim. 573, 1928 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/love-v-state-texcrimapp-1928.