Love v. State
251 S.W.3d 401, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 621, 2008 WL 1944583
Opinion
Order
Darnell Love appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion, following an eviden-tiary hearing. For reasons explained in the Memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm the motion court’s judgment. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Love v. State, 251 S.W.3d 401, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 621, 2008 WL 1944583 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
251 S.W.3d 401 (Love v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mortgage One Corporation Hfc v. Brenner-Lott
251 S.W.3d 401 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)