Love v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Love v. State

9 S.W.3d 677, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 2179, 1999 WL 1011909

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 9, 1999·No. No. ED 75781·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Corey Love, (“movant”), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County overruling his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant was convicted, after a jury trial, of trafficking in the second degree, section 195.223, RSMo 1994. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcripts, and find the judgment is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Corey Love, (“movant”), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County overruling his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant was convicted, after a jury trial, of trafficking in the second degree, section 195.223, RSMo 1994. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcripts, and find the judgment is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Love v. State, 9 S.W.3d 677, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 2179, 1999 WL 1011909 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

9 S.W.3d 677 (Love v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.