Love v. State

360 So. 2d 26
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Love v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 22352
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 6, 1978·No. No. 77-1209·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment of conviction based upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of involuntary sexual battery by threats of violence likely to cause serious injury.

It is appellant’s contention that the trial court erred in overruling his objections to the admission of testimony of collateral crimes and denying his motion for a mistrial.

We have carefully considered appellant’s contentions in the light of the record on appeal, and briefs and have concluded that reversible error has not been shown. Williams v. State, 110 So.2d 654 (Fla.1959); Rodriguez v. State, 327 So.2d 903 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), and Coppolino v. State, 223 So.2d 68 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968).

Therefore the judgment and sentence are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Love v. State, 360 So. 2d 26 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

360 So. 2d 26 (Love v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppolino v. State
223 So. 2d 68 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Rodriguez v. State
327 So. 2d 903 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Williams v. State
110 So. 2d 654 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1959)