Love v. Spector

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Love v. Spector

262 A.D.2d 536, 691 N.Y.S.2d 792, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6955

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 21, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 262 A.D.2d 536 (Love v. Spector) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Love v. Spector, 262 A.D.2d 536, 691 N.Y.S.2d 792, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6955 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover royalties from the sale of recordings pursuant to an alleged written agreement, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Bergerman, J.), dated April 9, 1998, as granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was to reduce damages or direct a new trial to the extent of ordering a new trial on the issue of damages unless she agreed to reduce the jury verdict from the sum of $263,500 to the sum of $131,750, and the defendants cross-appeal from so much of the same order as denied that branch of their motion which was to set aside the verdict and dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

[537]*537We find no basis to reverse or modify the order under review. S. Miller, J. P., Joy, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover royalties from the sale of recordings pursuant to an alleged written agreement, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Bergerman, J.), dated April 9, 1998, as granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was to reduce damages or direct a new trial to the extent of ordering a new trial on the issue of damages unless she agreed to reduce the jury verdict from the sum of $263,500 to the sum of $131,750, and the defendants cross-appeal from so much of the same order as denied that branch of their motion which was to set aside the verdict and dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

[537]*537We find no basis to reverse or modify the order under review. S. Miller, J. P., Joy, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D.2d 536, 691 N.Y.S.2d 792, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/love-v-spector-nyappdiv-1999.