Love v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided March 30, 2020·No. 18-1840·Unpublished

Opinion

CORRECTED

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 18-1840V UNPUBLISHED

GWENDOLYN LOVE, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: February 27, 2020 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Damages Decision Based on Proffer; HUMAN SERVICES, Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Guillain- Barre Syndrome (GBS) Respondent.

Bridget Candace McCullough, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner.

Linda Sara Renzi, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On November 30, 2018, Gwendolyn Love filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) as a result of receiving the influenza (flu) vaccine on December 10, 2015. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On January 22, 2020, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for her GBS. On February 26, 2020, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $155,000.00. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $155,000.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 15(a).

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

GWENDOLYN LOVE, ) ) Petitioner, ) No. 18-1840V ) Chief Special Master v. ) Brian H. Corcoran ) ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH ) AND HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) )

RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

I. Compensation for Vaccine Injury-Related Items

On November 30, 2018, petitioner filed a petition seeking compensation under the

Vaccine Act for Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) that she claimed occurred within the

Table timeframe following a flu vaccine. On January 21, 2020, respondent conceded that

entitlement to compensation was appropriate under the terms of the Vaccine

Act. Thereafter, on January 22, 2020, the Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement,

finding that petitioner was entitled to vaccine compensation for a GBS Table injury.

Respondent proffers that based on the evidence of record, petitioner should be

awarded $155,000.00. This amount represents all elements of compensation to which

petitioner is entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(1); 15(a)(3)(A); and 15(a)(4).

Petitioner agrees. II. Form of the Award

The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be

made through a lump sum payment as described below, and request that the Chief Special

Master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the following: 1

A lump sum payment of $155,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Gwendolyn Love. This amount accounts for all elements of compensation under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) to which petitioner is entitled.

Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.

Respectfully submitted,

JOSEPH H. HUNT Assistant Attorney General

C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division

CATHARINE E. REEVES Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division

GABRIELLE M. FIELDING Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division

/s/ Linda S. Renzi LINDA S. RENZI Senior Trial Counsel Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Dated: February 26, 2020 Tel.: (202) 616-4

1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Love v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2020).

Love v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Love v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(1)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a